If there are clubs whose missions we disagree with, we should be inspired to speak up, or start our own organizations. At the end of the day, the decision behind who gets to talk and how is just one big balancing game — and the scale should never fully tip to one side.
Now, amid a pandemic, student mental health presents an increasingly alarming crisis. How the university, the people within it, and the culture inhabiting it respond to this crisis holds great consequences for the wellbeing of our student body.
The conversation around critical race theory has been manufactured for the benefit of conservative activists and their ideals. It is a dangerous endeavor that will lead to censorship of true American history and further a narrative of American exceptionalism in classrooms and beyond.
In today’s environment of strict partisanship, academic campuses should be looking for every opportunity to invite a diverse range of speakers, and they should be encouraging openness and dialogue, not censorship and one-sidedness.
The pandemic proves to be a time that corners the arts in a hitherto unseen predicament. While the duration of the pandemic’s effects remains unknown and unpredictable, arts education must work around its technical and physical limitations, shifting the emphasis of its teachings from traditional repetition and performance to active engagement with society, and creating new opportunities for the future.
In an effort to accurately survey the political beliefs of Harvard College students, the Harvard Political Review collaborated with the Harvard Open Data Project and sent out a poll to the undergraduate body in mid-March. Over 235 responses were collected.
Despite having the purpose of making higher education more accessible to students, federal policy initiatives intended to support the affordability of college education, such as increasing federal student loan supplies, appear to be linked to the rise in college tuition.
We have a right to say no to endless, back-to-back Zoom meetings or to cut ourselves the slack of an extension. We have a right to prioritize our wellbeing, and there is no shame in that.
If students, academics, and politicians continue to push back against revisionist histories like Ramseyer’s, perhaps the road to reconciliation on the "comfort women" issue will be shorter than expected.
This is an argument in favor of breaks. An argument in favor of downtime, in favor of individuality, in favor of the idea that you are not just a transcript or a resume, that you are a whole person.
