Balancing Act: The Fairness Doctrine Revisited

The Fairness Doctrine—a 20th-century policy of the Federal Communications Commission—required radio and TV broadcasters to present balanced coverage on controversial issues. Since its repeal in 1987, the landscape of news media has drastically changed. Our access to a diverse range of news sources is greater than at any point in history, and yet the allegiance of viewers to their preferred talk show hosts and political pundits leaves us in silos and echo chambers, unwilling to hear the other side. In our age of polarization and misinformation, is a return to the Fairness Doctrine feasible? And would it help fix our broken media?

All Ad Hoc episodes can be found here and on Spotify.

Matthew Anzarouth

+ postsBio

Senior World Editor

• Matthew Anzarouth

  Justice By Means of Democracy: A Conversation with Danielle Allen
• Matthew Anzarouth

  Good Arguments with Bo Seo
• Matthew Anzarouth

  Picture Perfect: A Conversation with Professor Adatto
• Matthew Anzarouth

  A Conversation with Matthew Yglesias
• Matthew Anzarouth

  Guilty Admissions: Litigating Legacy
• Matthew Anzarouth

  A Canadian Province Experiments with Hard Drugs
• Matthew Anzarouth

  Highly Regulated
• Matthew Anzarouth

  Constitutional Conundrums: A Conversation with Jill Lepore
• Matthew Anzarouth

  Code of Ethics and Ethics of Code
• Matthew Anzarouth

  Not Just a Game
• Matthew Anzarouth

  The Wall Street Journal Dismisses Canada’s Gun Problem
• Matthew Anzarouth

  The Misguided Criticism of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Judicial Philosophy
• Matthew Anzarouth

  Does Judicial Supremacy Limit Social Progress? A Comparative Analysis of Abortion Rights in the U.S., Canada, and the U.K.
• Matthew Anzarouth

  Robots that Kill: The Case for Banning Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems